Problem: Debian + patched kernel as debian package + patched iptables with latest netfilter-l7 and ipp2p patches.
need some more restyling
apt-get source iptables (take it from debian-packports 1.3.3x)
get ipp2p source get netfilter-l7 source
untar iptables source from upstream and patch it with netfilter-l7-iptables patch. Create a .tgz and put it back at the same location.
untar patch-o-matic stuff .. put ipp2p stuff there ..
.. more to come
Need some styling
I downloaded the source package for iptables v1.3.5
and copied the source in '/usr/src/iptables-1.3.5.0debian1. Install the iptables-dev package (although I think it's not necessary if you install the iptables source package). You'll need the kernel-headers package too. I sent you my
Makefile. With this setup you just need to do make in the directory where the sources are. If you succeed, you will find a dynamic library
libipt_ipp2p.so, which you'll have to copy to
/lib/iptables/ and a kernel module called
ipt_ipp2p.ko (supposing you have a 2.6.x kernel in your system). Copy
ipt_ipp2p.ko in '/lib/modules/<your_kernel_version>/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ipp2p.ko
and type depmod -a
.
Try loading the module with modprobe ipt_ipp2p. If everything is OK try the following command:
iptables -m ipp2p --help
You should see some info about the usage of this module.
Thanks to Abel MartÃn at debian-firewall mailinglist.
I suggest the following tcp and udp for connection tracking (see docu section)
01# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -j CONNMARK --restore-mark 02# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT 03# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 1 04# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m mark --mark 1 -j CONNMARK --save-mark 05# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 1
detect TCP FIRST, SAVE MARK , and detect udp after you saved the mark !! You will have now every p2p packet marked, but a dramtic reduce of udp mismatches.
1) Download: * iptables-dev (apt-get) * kernel-headers-2.x.x (your kernel, "uname -r") * src of your iptables (iptables -V and apt-get source) * ipp2p-0.8.0.tar.gz (stable) 2) untar ipp2p and cd ipp2p 3) Edit Makefile, if it's necesary: * IPTABLES_SRC = /usr/src/iptables * In my case, the headers are detected automaticaly. 4) make (WITHOUT ERRORS!!! ;) ) 5) cp libipt_ipp2p.so /lib/iptables 6) cp ipt_ipp2p.ko /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter 7) depmod -A 8) insmod ipt_ipp2p.ko (or modprobe) 9) lsmod | grep ipp2p 10) iptables -m ipp2p --help
root@servidor:/usr/src/ipp2p-0.8.0# make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.15-28-386/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/ipp2p-0.8.0 modules make[1]: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-28-386' CC [M] /usr/src/ipp2p-0.8.0/ipt_ipp2p.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST CC /usr/src/ipp2p-0.8.0/ipt_ipp2p.mod.o LD [M] /usr/src/ipp2p-0.8.0/ipt_ipp2p.ko make[1]: se sale del directorio `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-28-386' gcc -O3 -Wall -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"\" -I/usr/src/iptables-1.3.3/include -fPIC -c libipt_ipp2p.c ld -shared -o libipt_ipp2p.so libipt_ipp2p.o
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much > filtering/shaping? > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:40:34 +0100 > > >Hi > > Hi > > >I have a router with a large number of iptables rules and some > >extensive traffic shaping (HTB + RED + ... ) + conntrack. > > Performance boost tips: > > - Use "set" module instead of sequential iptables rules. It can lower > cpu usage. > > - Use hashing filters for shaping if you're using many u32 filters. > > - configure conntrack to use bigger hashsize for better performance; > i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to achieve this: > ip_conntrack.hashsize=1048575 > > - configure routecache to use bigger to use more memory for better > performance; i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to > achieve this: rhash_entries=2400000 > > >1. What processors should I be looking for in order to achieve the > >best routing throughput on a linux router? > > I've had good experiences with P4 (with and without HT), Athlon64, Xeon > [dempsey], Xeon [woodcrest]. The last one is the best choice because of > the large cache and architecture. I think you can use Core 2 Duo too > if you want to save some money. > > >2. Is it true that multicore processors will not help much in this > >situation? > > Not true. In your setup with two nics with same load you can easily use > two cores. You can assign each nic to different core by the means of > smp_affinity setting in /proc/irq/... or by using irqbalance daemon.